James D. Murdock II

James "J.D." Murdock defends clients in complex litigation including wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases involving products liability, fire loss litigation, automobile liability, construction litigation, breach of contract, premises liability, class action, medical malpractice, and general negligence claims.  He also has served as monitoring counsel in numerous high-exposure cases throughout the country.

J.D. has appeared and represented clients in state and federal courts in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, North Carolina, Oregon and Pennsylvania.  Over the course of his career, he has taken over hundreds of lay and expert witness depositions, and represented clients in jury trials, arbitrations, appellate court proceedings mediations, and administrative law hearings.

In addition to his litigation practice, J.D. also is involved in transactional work including drafting of contracts for various marketing and consumer research companies.

His clients include Fortune 500 companies, national insurance firms, healthcare organizations, and governmental entities.

Personal Injury Litigation

• First-chair counsel in a jury trial involving personal injury lawsuit arising from a fight at a bar in Colorado.  The plaintiff alleged that he was struck in the head with a glass by the defendant that caused extensive lacerations and resulted in permanent scarring.  The case was defended on liability and damages.  Although the plaintiff asked for $250,000 in closing arguments, the jury returned a verdict in the amount of only $20,977.80.
• Second-chair attorney on a high-exposure traffic accident in Louisiana involving a truck operated by a national rent-to-own company. The plaintiff, who was rear-ended, sustained catastrophic injuries including paralysis from the chest down and sought lifetime medical care.  Prior to trial, plaintiff resolved her claims with the other underlying insurance companies. Therefore, under Louisiana’s direct action laws she had to achieve a verdict in excess of $29 million, the limits of the underlying insurance coverage, to recover any damages at trial.  At trial, the plaintiff claimed that the accident occurred because the truck driver was intoxicated and sought approximately $90 million in damages for economic, non-economic, and punitive damages.  The defense argued that the driver was not intoxicated and suggested that a reasonable amount of damages would be $11.4 million.  The jury returned a verdict in the amount of approximately $10.9 million and found no intoxication and no punitive damages. Therefore, the plaintiff recovered nothing at trial and the defense was awarded court costs as the prevailing party.
• Prevailed on a motion for summary adjudication in a California lawsuit involving a single vehicle accident wherein a young plaintiff sustained multiple spinal fractures and was rendered a paraplegic.  As a result of the favorable ruling, the client’s exposure was reduced from well over $1 million dollars to just $15,000.  Thereafter, the plaintiff and co-defendants filed petitions for writ of mandate to the Fifth District Court of Appeals challenging the trial court’s ruling, but the writs were denied.

Construction Defect Litigation

• Has litigated numerous construction defect cases filed pursuant to Colorado’s Construction Defect Reform Act (“CDARA”) as first-chair counsel in both arbitration proceedings and in state court actions. 

• First-chair counsel in a contentious 5-day construction defect arbitration hearing in Boulder County, Colorado.  Claimant sought over $1.1 million in damages arising from an extensive remodel of a high-end private residence and claimed defects with the in-floor radiant heating, electrical system, and a structural support wall.  Claimant also sought “stigma” damages for the impact that the purported construction defects would have on the future resale value of the home.   The defense disputed the scope of the allegedly defective conditions and challenged the damage model proposed by claimant.  The arbitrator ultimately entered a final award that was less than $70,000, found that there was no prevailing party, and denied claimant’s request for attorney’s fees and litigation costs made pursuant to the prevailing party clause in the construction contract.

• Prevailed on a motion to dismiss a general contractor’s claims against a subcontractor, NanaWall Systems, for negligence, contribution, breach of contract, and breach of warranty.  Tiny’s Granite Works, Inc. v. Mountain Resorts, Case No. 2016CV30126, District Court, Denver County, Colorado (2017).

Premises Liability Litigation

• Assisted in the defense of a high profile case in Colorado arising from a mass shooting at a movie theatre.
• Defense counsel for Florida apartment complex involving a shooting and allegations of negligent security.

General Litigation

• Obtained an opinion from the Colorado Court of Appeals, Division II, affirming a trial court’s $0 judgment in favor of a defendant in a dispute involving various real estate investments.
• Litigated numerous 42 U.S.C. §1983 lawsuits filed against State of Florida employees regarding alleged infringement of protections afforded under the 14th Amendment.

Medical Malpractice Litigation

• Defense verdict in a dental malpractice jury trial where the plaintiff demanded $350,000 in damages for failed dental implants. Case No. 2010- 061731 CA 01, Miami Dade County Circuit Court, Florida, Judge Jacqueline Hogan-Scola. (Reported in Florida Jury Verdict Review & Analysis, Vol. 24, Issue 4, April 2014 (Article ID 192542)).

Class Action Litigation

• Defeated motion for class certification involving 89,000 putative class members in a Florida lawsuit alleging that inspectors and inspection companies engaged in practices designed to raise homeowner’s insurance premiums through wind mitigation inspections.

Administrative Law Hearings

• Defended health care providers and state agencies in various administrative law hearings including medical license investigations by the Florida Department of Health, applications for services submitted to Florida’s Agency for Persons with Disabilities, and benefits provided by the Florida Department of Children and Families.

Colorado Utility Excavation Litigation

• Has served as defense counsel for various companies in lawsuits arising from alleged violations of Colorado Excavation Requirements Statute, C.R.S. Sect. 9-1.5-101, et. seq. (Colorado’s “Dig Statute”)

• Florida Office of the Attorney General, Assistant Attorney General, 2006 - 2008
• Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., Associate, 2008 - 2014